Tag Archives: terra cognita

“this fruition of boredom/the equation of us”

On Saturday afternoon I sat in the balmy sunshine of the Southbank listening to poetry and tweeting as the planet continued to heat to the point of expiration.

Damn fine poetry it was too. And no poetry damner and finer than Rhian Edwards.

What made Edwards utterly compelling and captivating was that she recited every word of every poem. Not a single word read, and so not a single word retrieved by eye from the page a distant-distancing two feet away before making the 10cm journey into her visual cortex, then pumped out of word-hole to the audience where only then we begin making sense of it all with our auditory wetware.

When you learn a poem by heart, the cells of all your body become marinated with that poem. It seems as if the distance between audience and speaker is reduced too.

If that poem is “yours”, then you are no doubt becoming even more marinated in yourself, more YOU, in a Whitmanesque, Singing-The-Body electric kind of way. Every lung-sponge, stomach-sac, bowels sweet and clean in service to that poem. Every armpit, breast-bone, jaw-hinge, freckle, heart-valve consorting to make you feel what the poet felt in the writing and now reciting of her thoughts and sentiments.

It’s altogether special, and I can’t really get enough of it, this marinating of my own cells in poetry. Particularly other people’s poems. I am already far too stewed to add self-expressiveness to the mix, but others people’s “stuff”, learnt by heart dovetails in extraordinary ways with to how I feel, think, and sometimes even act. It’s alchemical.

I also get a kick out of witnessing this alchemy in others, as one rarely can these day, unless you’re a Slam Poetry fundie. And even then: do you always want someone’s inner world microphone-slammed into you? (That is not a rhetorical question. The answer is no.)

This year’s theme for National Poetry Day is ‘Stars’, and so rather cleverly (unintentionally cleverly), a bunch of us have decided to gather together under the stars in the not so sweet and not so clean bowels of gothic Abney Park chapel to recite our favourite poems from the last couple of centuries.

We won’t be reciting work we’ve written (there’s enough of that about), but rather the poems we love, the poems we’ve ingested and set to work within us.

Tickets are £3 and all profits go to one The Reader Organisation‘s Care Leaver Apprenticeship programme.

Do join us: http://byheart.readmesomethingyoulove.com/events/

This piece was written for The National Poetry Day website.

Terra Cognita #3: Waiting

Seven million anti-anxiety prescriptions are doled out to us UK island dwellers every year.

That’s a lot pills just in order to quell the exclamatory voices in our head that yelp things like:

“I’m out of control!”
“I can’t deal with this!”
“Oh, shit!”
“I don’t want this feeling!”
[Add your favourite Anxious Thought here]

Anti-anxiety pills, as we know, work on two levels. There is the chemical substance which slooooows down the transmission of information between nerve synapses tricking the brain into thinking that slow-motion equals “calm” (and in some ways it does). And then of course there’s the placebo effect: I am doing something (taking a pill) to help me with this other thing that I just can’t stand. Or think I can’t stand. No, but really, I can’t.

I am not against taking anti-depressants or anxiolytics, but might I be able to do something to reduce or tolerate my anxiety whilst at the same time being more alive to those bulletins from within - often arriving on the crest of the anxious wave?

I’ve always found the focus of meditation and exercise useful, combined with some sort of broadly “spiritual” word-balm[1] but I’m wondering if learning poems[2] might work equally well.

I might experiment with this in the next couple of weeks in which I’ll be doing a certain amount of anxious waiting. Waiting for an operation in my case[3], but of course we’re all waiting, for something, almost constantly. So anytime is a good time to be doing this.

Rogan Wolf‘s wonderful Poems For organisation commissions work from leading contemporary poets which are then offered as wall displays on screen and in Anxious Spaces (GP surgeries, hospitals, dentists).

In the next week or two, I will be “equipping myself” with some of these Poetic Pills, specifically poems about waiting[4], and reporting back to you until my operation as to how effective the learning and reciting of the poems have been in keeping my nerves at bay.

OK?

Footnotes    (↵ returns to text)
  1. Buddhist talks and “sermons” appeal, but whatever speaks to you really. Even the much derided self-help books have genuinely helped me at times.
  2. Any poem you love will do. But maybe even something relatively targeted to what ails you. Relative being the key-word, as even prescription drugs are fairly arbitrary elixirs, with medicine created with one pathology in mind found to work quite well for a host of others.
  3. Run-of-the-mill surgery, nothing serious. And yet, and yet, a kind of Woody-Allenesque neurosis attends any surgery doesn’t it? Thoughts like: ”Serious complications arising from general anaesthesia are only 1 in 10,000, death is 1 in 100,000, but those figure doesn’t necessarily make me feel particularly cheery, Doc.”
  4. I’ve chosen Rogan Wolf’s Across The Way, Angus MacMillan’s Dancing In The Waiting Room, and I Am Waiting by Lawrence Ferlinghetti.

Terra Cognita #2: Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes

Only a month in, and already I’m moving the goalposts.

My original side-bar description read:

A year of living (and learning) by heart a poem a week - with reflections on memory, poetry, and other “stuff” as I go along.

It now reads:

A year (June 2012 - June 2013[1]) of living and learning by heart the poems I love - with reflections on memory, poetry, and other “stuff” as I go along.

The poem-a-week idea went out the window because, as you can see, I am still memorising and think-feeling my way into ‘What Is The Language Using Us For’, and it’s turned into a relatively slow process.

The hectoring part of me says: “The deal was 52 poems, Steve. One a week! Where’s the discipline, the framework, the bankability of “as many poems as I can get through, in as long as it takes me”. People want feats they can turn into shareable memes. He learnt a poem a day! He made a skull art-work every day, for a year! Erik Schveima did a year of incredible mixed-media drawings inspired by the LA Times, one a day! And you can’t even memorise a poem a week!?”

The anti-Hector however says: “But isn’t this whole thing about less is more? Aren’t you discovering as you go along, that it feels really really good to get that poem well written into and onto your bones, as Kim Rosen would say, that the longer you spend steeping yourself in its lines, the more they reveal to you? Take your time, go slow, go deep. Enjoy.”

I like the anti-Hector. We should hang out more often.

Footnotes    (↵ returns to text)
  1. Even these dates are somewhat mendacious. I didn’t start doing this in June, but July. And yet, my birthday’s in June, and it was around this time that I felt I needed a mid-year resolution. July has no significance for me, so June it is. I wonder if The Bible was written bit like this: focusing on the meaningful, not worrying too much about the historical.

Terra Cognita #1: The Importance of Being Earnest

I don’t think I realised how nourishing a single poem might be until I started learning them by heart. Just a couple of lines of language, returned to, day in day out, engaged with earnestly, like prayer, or telling someone you love them.

We’re not very comfortable with earnestness anymore, are we? Maybe because blinkered zealotry often tags along with it, the kind of zealotry that brings big buildings with lots of people in them crashing down to the ground. Only the very uncool are allowed to be earnest: the religious and religiose, teenage outcasts, birdwatchers, vegans and the like. But one cannot pray or love ironically, even if you’re not exactly sure what either of these enterprises entail. A certain amount of conviction is required to do these kinds of activities.

There’s much solace in this recognition of how “little” one needs to be happy. How the right amount of little can seem a lot. I feel this solace every time I pick up my oft-folded, timeworn 3 x 5 card on which I’ve written this week’s poem, and set out for a walk around the block, or even a pacing session in the garden, committing a few more words to memory. And in doing so: hearing, seeing, feeling certain lines anew.

David Whyte affirms that everything is waiting for you, but if this “everything” happens to be the entire language lode of the human species, not just waiting but ever-available to us, through a split-second Google search at any moment of the day, on almost any device, are we not going to gorge ourselves silly on information?

And in that gorging, will we at times (if not almost always) forget to taste, to savour, to chew? To pause? To put down the fork? To honour, experience and enjoy? All the things we do when we’re learning a poem we love. It’s incredibly simple, we’re just putting down the fork between each mouthful and giving ourselves as fully as possible up to pleasures of language and what it can do for us, or we for it.

I am incredibly greedy for information: “new” ideas, mental-kicks and tricks. This doesn’t sound like a problem until you rephrase it as my brain, through the use of technology, is becoming more and more quick-click stimulant- searching, and less and less able to go deep, to get truly to the heart of a poem, or a story, which only a very close, time-invested reading of a text will provide.

Larry Rosen gets to the nub of it, for me, when he diagnoses chronic screen-grazers (that would be all of us then) as having a variant of ADHD. The “deficit” comes from the misconception that we are able to multitask:

Research tells us there is no such thing as multitasking - that all we can really do is task switch. In other words people lack the ability to pay full attention to two tasks at a time.

Recently, “just for fun”, I’ve been trying to track the amount of task-switching I do during an hour online. The hyperlinked internet is of course designed almost entirely for task-switching and thus mind-addling. It is an ADHD-generating media. Are the costs of multi-tasking ever equal to their benefits? Here are the costs, you tell me:

  1. Attention difficulties
  2. Poor decision making
  3. Lack of depth of material
  4. Information overload
  5. Internet addiction
  6. Poor sleep habits
  7. Overuse of caffeine

It don’t look good. But thankfully, there is always language for us to use and be used by. Poetry seems to have become my Ritalin, what’s yours?